<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSDL 2.0: A New Hope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larve.net/people/hugo/2005/blog/2007/03/03/wsdl-20-a-new-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larve.net/people/hugo/2005/blog/2007/03/03/wsdl-20-a-new-hope/</link>
	<description>Really random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3612</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Downey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; W3C Workshop on Web of Services for Enterprise Computing</title>
		<link>http://larve.net/people/hugo/2005/blog/2007/03/03/wsdl-20-a-new-hope/comment-page-1/#comment-50493</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Downey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; W3C Workshop on Web of Services for Enterprise Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larve.net/people/hugo/2005/blog/2007/03/03/wsdl-20-a-new-hope/#comment-50493</guid>
		<description>[...] Hugo, presenting on behalf of Yahoo! and others made a better fist highlighting BT&#8217;s main pain points than I did: WS-* is attractive to developers, but doesn&#8217;t interoperate. Fix that. In particular fix databinding. Better support for WS-Security (WSS) would be nice, in particular surrounding authentication, but for the most part WS-* has gone striving off into la-la-land. YAGNI. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hugo, presenting on behalf of Yahoo! and others made a better fist highlighting BT&#8217;s main pain points than I did: WS-* is attractive to developers, but doesn&#8217;t interoperate. Fix that. In particular fix databinding. Better support for WS-Security (WSS) would be nice, in particular surrounding authentication, but for the most part WS-* has gone striving off into la-la-land. YAGNI. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
